![]() Equipping You to Communicate Effectively | support CMN & share a library of 19K+ images, videos, etc Go Pro! |
![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
| General Projection Systems Projectors, screens, scalers, switchers, scan converters and other display equipment. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| ||||
| First off - how did you determine what projector model (brightness) you needed? This can be calculated and if your consultant is worth his salt he should know this. A switching scaler makes a huge difference in how smoothly your service will run. The quality of the scaler also makes a visible difference when you are projecting low res video (camera, dvd, vhs). We have a couple of FSR (same as Folsom) scalers at my church. We are extremely happy with them. Check out this FORMAT CONCERSION BUYERS GUIDE. PCH |
| |||
| A few questions need to be answered before we can make good comments on your post. 1. How far away from the screens are the projectors going to be mounted? This will help determine the lens requirements to fill the screens. 2. Why are you going with 4:3 format? In a very short time, 16:9 will become the standard. 3. What are you going to display on the screens? Just sermon notes and song lyrics? If you plan on anything more than one computer (Like DVD, VHS tape, a live camera), then you definately will want a scaler switch. The number of video sources that you will have will determine what device will best suit your needs. 4. Will the confidence monitor screen always show the same image as that on the main screens? If not, then you will either need a matrix switch or a separate scaler switch for the confidence monitor screen and the main screens. 5. Has the consultant measured the ambiant light levels at each screen in the sanctuary? Has this been factored included in the calculation of your projector brightness? Are the light levels at each screen controlable? Can it be reduced easily? 6. Do you have any control on the lighting (faders) in the room? I hope that the consultant has taken all of this into consideration. If not, you may want to seek advice from another consultant. |
| |||||||
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for you help, D |
| ||||
| All of these factors can be calculated - your consultant should have done this for you. The required screen size can be determined with some degree of certainty. Screen size should not be left up to an opinion (it looks good). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Best regards, PCH Last edited by PHugger; Monday, March 14th, 2005 at 11:03 AM. |
| ||||
| Out of curiosity, how large is the room? Quote:
|
| |||
| I know you have a building designed already, but in general I'll just throw out my beef/rant for the day. If media has become an integeral aspect of ministry in a building why is it left to where it will fit in and how much of it will fit in? Why do the designers, or better, why do the church committees not seek out media specs that are required before even talking to an architect? Why not tell the architect we need a church, it needs x, y, z in the sanctuary. The pulpit could be x, the lighting could be y and z could be the media, you get the idea. Then the church is not left with fitting in what will just barely work for screen placement and sizing, and a good control area and sizing can also be included right from the get go. The day is fast approaching when 16:9 will be here in full swing. Unless you are of the opinion the rapture will be taking place in the next couple years I would advise atleast re-assessing going 16:9. Our laptops today are already moving rapidly away from 4:3, our better televisions are, most all DVD's are. The basic projectors have had some form of wide option for several years now. I just think in a nice new building it would be advisable to seriously consider. What is the difference in cost between the correctly sized 4:3 screen vrs the correctly sized 16:9 vrs the overall cost of the building project. There are other considerations to 16:9 too but in the big scheme what does it do to the bottom line vrs having to redo it in short order? |
| ||||
| XDX, As FSR is a technology partner with Folsom Research, (we manufacturer and co-design products together,) there is a major problem here that may affect the budget of this system. The cost of the Encore, shown last week at the NSCA show in Orlando as the FSR Eagle 300 series, is a three part system. A controller, processor and a matrix is required. The budget figure you quoted is not the entire system. It is under list price for the Seamless Switcher Processor only. They may have the Encore/Eagle 300 system on separate line items on the budget, but I wanted you to be sure they have not left anything out on your system. Now that said, you are looking at the most incredible switcher technology available today. I know it is against the rules for us guys, but I am going to even read the manual on this system! With the ability to add 6 layers of images on one display, it is going to give us more flexibility than we have ever had with a seamless switcher. Sorry about the rant, I am still excited from showing this system last week. Thank you all for serving Jesus Christ, G-2 |
| ||||
| Jnorth, Tell it brother! I agree on your outlook that a lot of architects have on design! They make a pretty room with 7 seconds of reverb, support columns where screens should be and then tell us to make it work. FSR is taking a new approach and teaching classes to architects to try to let them see the other side of the media issues. Some food for thought on 16:9 projection today; there are less than 5 true 16:9 native projectors available today and the cost are big dollars per lumen output! The existing projectors available today will turn off some of the pixels on the 4:3 display to give you a 16:9 image. But remember that you will be turning off about 30 percent of your light output so the will not be as bright. I am not saying to not consider 16:9! I only want you to be aware of this transition time of the 4:3 to 16:9 size screens. I love the fact that you can put so much more of the lyrics on the screen! We can display it like we sing it. BTX, I just saw the mention of the FSR Omni, I would be happy to answer any questions you may have if you are comfortable with that, or I can send you contact names for church users, if you like. By the way, The FSR S-2 that was recently discontinued is almost identical to the Omni-Navigator. I know several of our CM brothers on this forum use the S-2. They will tell it like it is, good or bad!!! I love my Churchmedia .net!!! Thank you all for serving, G-2 |
| ||||
| Quote:
I am looking for a solution that can manage and layer (at least) three S-Video feeds, 1 VGA, and either an additional S-Video feed or Component for the DVD/VCR. We will have a third confidence screen that will basicly be the VGA feed without the additional video layering. Do you feel that the Omni/Omni-Navigator is adequate for this type of solution or do you have an additional alternative. I believe that while the Encore is amazing, it is probably a little overkill for our uses. Let me know what you think, D |