The Church Media Community
Equipping You to Communicate Effectively
support CMN & share a
library of 19K+ images, videos, etc
Go Pro!
 
Go Back   The Church Media Community > Audio > Audio Signal Processing
Forgot Password?
                          Register

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wednesday, November 17th, 2010, 09:21 AM
New Church Media Member

 
 Join Date: Nov 2010 
 Last Online: Tuesday, May 31st, 2011 
Thinking of using a Sabine Phantom Mic Rider

I help with the audio at our small church, we are trying to retain a hands off approach during the service but need to mute the pulpit microphone when its not in use. I've been looking at using a Sabine Phantom Mic Rider. Does anyone have experience (good or bad) using this product.

Thanks

Simon
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wednesday, November 17th, 2010, 03:21 PM
New Church Media Member

 
 Join Date: Oct 2010 
 Last Online: Tuesday, June 28th, 2011 
Isn't that what the mute button is for?

Sounds like you want an automatic mixer. Never used one myself but it is the kind of mixer you find in a hotel ball room or a board room. That Sabine thing seems pretty good but it would only effect one mic. An automatic mixer would effect every input.
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wednesday, November 17th, 2010, 04:33 PM
Church Media Mentor
Become a CMN Professional Member!

 
 Join Date: Jun 2008 
 Last Online: Yesterday 
The Sabine phantom mic rider does not base the gating on the audio signal level like a gated automixer, it instead uses an infrared sensor to detect a physical presence in order to turn the mic on. One model also includes some DSP including a proximity effect circuit and an AGC that use the same sensor to judge how far the talker is from the mic and then apply a related level and frequency compensation.

Perhaps the general issue is what defines the mic not being in use for your application. That could determine whether audio, infrared or pressure sensing (as in stepping on a pressure sensitive floor mat) might be most appropriate.
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thursday, November 18th, 2010, 07:30 AM
New Church Media Member

 
 Join Date: Nov 2010 
 Last Online: Tuesday, May 31st, 2011 
Our plan at the moment is to disable the microphone when there is nobody behind the pulpit. The alternative of a pressure sensitive floor mat is interesting and something we should consider as an alternative.

It is what the mute button is for, in my experience only 1 in 10 people are capable of using the mute button.

Thanks

Simon
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thursday, November 18th, 2010, 11:03 AM
waynehoskins's Avatar
The Crazy Analog Guy

 
 Join Date: May 2006 
 Last Online: Yesterday 
Quote:
Originally Posted by simondg View Post
It is what the mute button is for, in my experience only 1 in 10 people are capable of using the mute button.
You'd think that any board op capable of mixing the service could figure out the mute button for the pulpit channel...
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thursday, November 18th, 2010, 04:10 PM
New Church Media Member

 
 Join Date: Jan 2010 
 Last Online: Wednesday, October 17th, 2012 
Quote:
Originally Posted by waynehoskins View Post
You'd think that any board op capable of mixing the service could figure out the mute button for the pulpit channel...
I think the goal is being able to have the mic muted when not in use and unmuted when someone comes to use it without having someone sitting behind a board and mixing.
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Friday, November 19th, 2010, 06:39 AM
New Church Media Member

 
 Join Date: Nov 2010 
 Last Online: Tuesday, May 31st, 2011 
You got it ntravis, no board op. I was speaking of experience with service participants using the mute button, I reckon 1 in 10 can use it well and consistently.
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Saturday, November 20th, 2010, 06:25 AM
pdc pdc is offline
Church Media Mentor

 
 Join Date: May 2009 
 Last Online: Saturday, May 11th, 2013 
Quote:
Originally Posted by simondg View Post
I help with the audio at our small church, we are trying to retain a hands off approach during the service but need to mute the pulpit microphone when its not in use. I've been looking at using a Sabine Phantom Mic Rider. Does anyone have experience (good or bad) using this product.

Thanks

Simon
This is a sad day when people cannot listen and flip a switch. I run into this all the time. We got a request for operator free system, for a 1500 member church, with 7 services (all different formats), with choirs, bands, etc, and nobody managing the stage. Uh....ok.
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Saturday, November 20th, 2010, 08:12 AM
drew ryan's Avatar
Board of Directors
Become a CMN Professional Member!

 
 Join Date: Jan 2003 
 Last Online: Saturday, May 11th, 2013 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdc View Post
This is a sad day when people cannot listen and flip a switch. I run into this all the time. We got a request for operator free system, for a 1500 member church, with 7 services (all different formats), with choirs, bands, etc, and nobody managing the stage. Uh....ok.
That is a recipe for disaster. Auto mixers can only do so much and they cannot trouble shoot.

It sounds like this service is very liturgical in nature and may only have 1 mic that needs to be on or off. That could be very boring for a volunteer to be responsible for.
__________________
Peace (Phil 4:7)

Drew
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sunday, November 21st, 2010, 01:46 AM
pdc pdc is offline
Church Media Mentor

 
 Join Date: May 2009 
 Last Online: Saturday, May 11th, 2013 
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew ryan View Post
That is a recipe for disaster. Auto mixers can only do so much and they cannot trouble shoot.

It sounds like this service is very liturgical in nature and may only have 1 mic that needs to be on or off. That could be very boring for a volunteer to be responsible for.
We spent a bunch of time with the client, installed a Roland M400 system and a custom RS232 control pad, which recalls the service settings remotely. They have been forced to learn how to use a mic, how to balance themselves and their instruments acoustically (what a novel concept, right?). It is working without a sound man. They have offered to pay someone but no one will step up, so...they do what they have to do.
Reply With Quote Start a New Topic From This Comment
Reply

  The Church Media Community > Audio > Audio Signal Processing

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



Add to Google


Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our community. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:
Agree to forum rules 


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 AM.

   
 
© 1995-2008, ChurchMedia™, ChurchMedia LLC

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0