| Need opinion on best practices: Reverb We've got a Mackie 8X32 board that seems to be designed more for studio recording than live perfromances. However, it's a good board and it's what we have.
We also have a Reverb unit (Sorry, don't know model or manufacturer) that we use to add a little reverb to the vocals.
The "issue" is how to include the reverb in the sound path. Up until now, we have used a monitor channel to feed into the reverb unit and output that to a free channel on the board. This has the advantage of allowing us to specify which channnels will have the reverb (by adding them to that monitor mix) and to have one slider to control overall reverb on the board itself. However, it is using a monitor channel, and there have certainly been cases where I would have liked to have one more monitor mix on stage.
What I did, and is in dispute by others, was that I fed one of our sumaster mixes to the reverb unit. We split all our channel up to the submaster mixes based on usage: Insturments on 3/4, vocals on 5/6, and percussion on 7/8. This frees up a monitor mix. It also places all vocalists into reverb (although I figured out how to remove some channels through innovative use of the 'pan' feature). The output from the reverb unit is still fed into on of the channels, so we still have single-slider control for total reverb.
One of the other sound techs tells me that he heard someone say that the "way it is done" is to use a monitor mix, and we should live without the monitor mix in case a professional sound engineer comes to our Church (which actually will happen in a couple weeks) to use our equipment. Does anyone have an insight in what the 'Best Practices' are for handling reverb? |