![]() Equipping You to Communicate Effectively | support CMN & share a library of 19K+ images, videos, etc Go Pro! |
![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Quote:
The key is to be clear as to what signal is what. I would suggest making up a short snake with paper tape (or permanent) labels so the house PA guy will know exactly what cable you expect to go to mains, subs, monitors and whatever else. Also make sure that during your sound check you confirm not only your inputs but every output discreetly to make sure you know exactly what is being effected when you push certain faders on your desk.
__________________ Tom D'Angelo New York City |
| |||
| You may get a wide range of responses. Some groups demand direct access to the speaker system, completely bypassing the house mixing and FOH processing, and full access to any house system processing. On the one hand I understand that their goal is to have as much direct control over the final result as possible. On the other hand, this could also be a sign of someone that assumes they could always do a 'better' job of setting the house processing regardless of what is in place and/or wants to try to get more out of the system than they should. The other end of the spectrum is more of what you described, outputs from your mixer into the house console with their people having control of their console and system. And there are plenty of options in between those two. You need to decide what level of control and access you require in order to deliver the result you want as best you can. Where tying into another console can get more complex is if you are dealing with not just the main mix but also multiple other mixes, such as monitor mixes, and if the intent is to use the house wiring for those as well. Your comment regarding dropping your show into someone else's M7CL may make sense, but with some caveats. First, always make sure you discuss this and don't just do it as you may find some people that have not saved the current console setup, although you may help them by showing them how to do that and then being able to load and recall your show. Second, if they use the console processing for the house processing then it may not be practical to do anything that would significantly change those aspects. This is one reason why I like to separate the console and house processing and provide a dedicated system processor. Finally, while there is much that will be common, you will likely also have to modify your file for each venue as aspects such as the physical connectivity and logical bus assignments to the physical I/O may differ for each venue. This is especially true in terms of the Aviom as not only may not every M7CL have an Aviom card in it, they may also not have limited outputs available to go into an Aviom interface. |
| ||||
| Thanks for the replies guys! I agree with all that has been said. To me it seems the "best" way if I am going to use a house system is to use my console and use outputs for L/R and a seperate output for subs (which of course would change depending on how their subs are setup) and and go direct in to their console. I won't need their monitors or any other mixes because all our musicians use Avioms and in ears which would come out of my console. |